Image of Mono Lake Research area. Photo: NASA.gov

NASA’s discovery of life as we don’t know it

Remember the hype before December when NASA released a press conference regarding “astrobiological findings”? Everyone thought it was related to extraterrestial life. It was not. Maybe because of that, it din’t get the press it deserved.

Image of GFAJ-1 grown on arsenic. Image Credit: Jodi Switzer Blum

GFAJ-1 grown on arsenic. Photo: Jodi Switzer Blum

However the results they presented were nonetheless very interesting and indeed mind-blowing: Life has been discovered – here on Earth – with arsenic in its genome.

The discovery of an organism that thrives on otherwise poisonous arsenic broadens our thinking about the possibility of life on other planets, and begs a rewrite of biology textbooks by changing our understanding of how life is formed from its most basic elemental building blocks. Astrobiology Magazine has the story.

Image of GFAJ-1 grown on phosphorus. Image Credit: Jodi Switzer Blum

GFAJ-1 grown on phosphorus. Photo: Jodi Switzer Blum

Previously it was thought (except in theory) that all life had DNA and DNA used phosphor. This organism apparently can use/uses arsenic instead of phosphor in its genome structure. Probably as a result from living in California in the “Mono Lake because of its unusual chemistry, especially its high salinity, high alkalinity, and high levels of arsenic”. A result from being isolated from fresh water in 50 years.

On the tree of life, according to the results of 16S rRNA sequencing, the rod-shaped GFAJ-1 nestles in among other salt-loving bacteria in the genus Halomonas. Many of these bacteria are known to be able to tolerate high levels of arsenic.

I can’t help to say that I’m very amazed by this finding. Unfortunately I haven’t really seen it picked up anywhere in the general press, outside of science magazines. But please, people, discuss it. It rocks the foundation, and possibilities, of life and our understanding of it.

Update: It seems these reports are “under fire” however, for flaws in the scientific research/report. Interesting to follow. As of yet I haven’t had time reading through any of the skeptic material. Many microbiologists seem to oppose the findings for some reason at least.

One thought on “NASA’s discovery of life as we don’t know it”

  1. Om resultatet stämmer betyder det att en av biologins grunddogmer måste skrivas om. För så viktiga resultat gäller att man måste vara extremt noga med kontrollexperiment och NASA har inte gjort sig kända för detta.
    Uppsatsen ligger inte ute på Science ännu, bara medlemmar kan läsa preprintet. Så, om forsket är sloppy eller inte är svårt att avgöra ännu.
    Vad gäller kommentaren på Slate.com ska man nog vara försiktig. Slate verkar vara ett verktyg för den kristna ultrahögern i USA. En artikel i Slate: http://www.slate.com/id/2277104/ , slår fast att det är farligt att fler vetenskapsmän är demokrater än republikaner!!!
    “A Pew Research Center Poll from July 2009 showed that only around 6 percent of U.S. scientists are Republicans; 55 percent are Democrats, 32 percent are independent, and the rest “don’t know” their affiliation.”
    Intressant åsikt!


Vänligen notera att kommentarer modereras och behöver godkännande innan publicering. Detta är en följd av att sidan har utgivningsbevis, där ett krav är förhandsmoderering för eventuella kommentarsfält.

Subscribe to RSS Do you want to follow future comments on this post? Please subscribe to RSS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to RSS Do you want to follow future comments on this post? Please subscribe to RSS.